Disturbance Rejection Attitude Control for a Quadrotor: Theory and Experiment

13Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, an attitude tracking controller is designed for a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) subject to lumped disturbances. Firstly, the attitude dynamical model of the quadrotor under external disturbances is established. Subsequently, an improved sliding mode control (SMC) strategy is designed based on the linear extended state observer (LESO). In this control scheme, the SMC will guarantee the sliding surface is finite time reachable and the LESO will estimate and compensate for the lumped disturbances. Then, the robustness and asymptotic stability of the proposed controller are proved by the stability analyses. Finally, three numerical simulation cases and comparative flight experiments validate the effectiveness of the developed controller.

References Powered by Scopus

Generalized extended state observer based control for systems with mismatched uncertainties

806Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The GRASP multiple micro-UAV testbed

681Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On stability analysis of active disturbance rejection control for nonlinear time-varying plants with unknown dynamics

609Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Robust Trajectory Tracking for an Uncertain UAV Based on Active Disturbance Rejection

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On Active Vibration Absorption in Motion Control of a Quadrotor UAV

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adaptive Fuzzy Attitude Sliding Mode Control for a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ding, L., He, Q., Wang, C., & Qi, R. (2021). Disturbance Rejection Attitude Control for a Quadrotor: Theory and Experiment. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8850071

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Researcher 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

71%

Psychology 2

29%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free