An analysis of the journey of open and distance education: Major concepts and cutoff points in research trends

20Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In an effort to understand trends in open and distance education more comprehensively, this study aims to identify the research trends, major concepts, and cutoff points in the articles published between 2009 and 2016. From five major peer-reviewed journals, a total of 989 articles were analyzed through a systematic literature review process using content analysis. The articles were coded based on the following three categories: level, topics, and sub-topics. The results indicated the followings: (1) emerged main themes in the articles were foundations of open and distance education, instructional process, and effects of applications; (2) there was an upward growth in the publishing of the articles on massive open online courses, open educational resources, and students' perspectives; (3) new pedagogical approaches and online learning design played a triggering role in the research topics; and (4) technological and pedagogical developments between 2011 and 2012 had an influence on the tendency of the articles. In addition, we explored cutoff points so that they may provide insights and valuable hints for researchers to design new studies in open and distance education field. Discussions about the gaps in the state-of-the-art trends and directions about future research were also included.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Mobile usability in educational contexts: What have we learnt?

232Citations
310Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

47Citations
145Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Çakiroğlu, Ü., Kokoç, M., Gökoğlu, S., Öztürk, M., & Erdoğdu, F. (2019). An analysis of the journey of open and distance education: Major concepts and cutoff points in research trends. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3743

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

55%

Researcher 10

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 27

60%

Arts and Humanities 7

16%

Computer Science 6

13%

Psychology 5

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0