Manganese toxicity in sugarcane plantlets grown on acidic soils of southern China

38Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ratoon sugarcane plantlets in southern China have suffered a serious chlorosis problem in recent years. To reveal the causes of chlorosis, plant nutrition in chlorotic sugarcane plantlets and the role of manganese (Mn) in this condition were investigated. The study results showed that the pH of soils growing chlorotic plantlets ranged from 3.74 to 4.84. The symptoms of chlorosis were similar to those of iron (Fe) deficiency while the chlorotic and nonchlorotic plantlets contained similar amount of Fe. Chlorotic plantlets had 6.4-times more Mn in their leaf tissues compared to the control plants. There was a significantly positive correlation between Mn concentration in the leaves and the exchangeable Mn concentration in the soils. Moreover, leaf Mn concentration was related to both seasonal changes in leaf chlorophyll concentration and to the occurrence of chlorosis. Basal stalks of mature sugarcanes contained up to 564.36 mg·kg-1 DW Mn. Excess Mn in the parent stalks resulted in a depress of chlorophyll concentration in the leaves of sugarcanes as indicated by lower chlorophyll concentration in the leaves of plantlets emerged from basal stalks. Ratoon sugarcane plantlets were susceptible to chlorosis due to high Mn accumulation in their leaves (456.90-1626.95 mg·kg-1 DW), while in planted canes chlorosis did not occur because of low Mn accumulation (94.64-313.41mg·kg-1 DW). On the other hand, active Fe content in chlorotic plantlets (3.39 mg kg-1 FW) was only equivalent to 28.2% of the concentration found in the control. These results indicate that chlorosis in ratoon sugarcane plantlets results from excessive Mn accumulated in parent stalks of planted cane sugarcanes grown on excessive Mn acidic soils, while active Fe deficiency in plantlets may play a secondary role in the chlorosis.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Chlorotic sugarcane plantlets (A), spreading leaf (B), and spread leaf (C, D, E) showing yellowing on the whole spreading leaf (B) and the first spread leaf (C), yellow-white leaf (D), and margin necrotized and withered leaf (E).
  • Fig 2. Chlorophyll concentrations in sugarcane leaves of chlorotic plantlets grown in chlorosis affected fields and non-chlorotic plantlets (control) grown in chlorosis unaffected fields. Each value is the mean ± SEM (n = 3 replicates). Pairwise Student’s t test was used to compare value to the control. **, Significant at P = 0.01.
  • Fig 3. Mn concentration in the leaves of chlorotic and non-chlorotic plantlets. Each value is the mean ± SEM (n = 3 replicates). Pairwise Student’s t test was used to compare value to the control. **, Significant at P = 0.01.
  • Table 1. Concentrations of N, Mg, S, Zn, Fe and Mn in the leaves of chlorotic and non-chlorotic (control) sugarcane plantlets at various sites. Pairwise Student's t-test was used to compare values to the control.
  • Fig 4. The relationship between Mn concentration in the leaves of sugarcane plantlets and exchangeable Mn in the corresponding soils. ** indicates statistical significance (p<0.01) according to correlation pertinent statistic.
  • Fig 5. Mn concentration in the leaves of chlorotic plantlets and neighboring plantlets (Control) without chlorosis symptoms. Each value is the mean ± SEM (n = 3 replicates). Pairwise Student’s t test was used to compare value to the control. **, Significant at P = 0.01.
  • Table 2. Comparison of the concentrations of chlorophyll and Mn in leaves between ratoon sugarcanes and planted cane sugarcanes grown in achlorotic field in Chongzuo, Guangxi, China. Pairwise Student's t-test was used to compare values to planted cane sugarcane.
  • Fig 6. Time course of chlorophyll and Mn concentration alternation in the leaves of planted cane and ratoon sugarcanes, which were emerged on the basal stalks of the planted cane sugarcane. The leaves were collected on Jul 7, Sep 25, and Nov 23 of 2012 and Mar 29, May 6, Jun 19, Jul 23, and Nov 25 of 2013, respectively. Each value is the mean ± SEM (n = 3 replicates).

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

514Citations
620Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, Y. L., Yang, S., Long, G. X., Zhao, Z. K., Li, X. F., & Gu, M. H. (2016). Manganese toxicity in sugarcane plantlets grown on acidic soils of southern China. PLoS ONE, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148956

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

67%

Researcher 5

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

69%

Chemistry 3

19%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Engineering 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0