Targeting CD28, CTLA-4 and PD-L1 costimulation differentially controls immune synapses and function of human regulatory and conventional t-cells

60Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

CD28, CTLA-4 and PD-L1, the three identified ligands for CD80/86, are pivotal positive and negative costimulatory molecules that, among other functions, control T cell motility and formation of immune synapse between T cells and antigen-presenting cells (APCs). What remains incompletely understood is how CD28 leads to the activation of effector T cells (Teff) but inhibition of suppression by regulatory T cells (Tregs), while CTLA-4 and PD-L1 inhibit Teff function but are crucial for the suppressive function of Tregs. Using alloreactive human T cells and blocking antibodies, we show here by live cell dynamic microscopy that CD28, CTLA-4, and PD-L1 differentially control velocity, motility and immune synapse formation in activated Teff versus Tregs. Selectively antagonizing CD28 costimulation increased Treg dwell time with APCs and induced calcium mobilization which translated in increased Treg suppressive activity, in contrast with the dampening effect on Teff responses. The increase in Treg suppressive activity after CD28 blockade was also confirmed with polyclonal Tregs. Whereas CTLA-4 played a critical role in Teff by reversing TCR-induced STOP signals, it failed to affect motility in Tregs but was essential for formation of the Treg immune synapse. Furthermore, we identified a novel role for PD-L1-CD80 interactions in suppressing motility specifically in Tregs. Thus, our findings reveal that the three identified ligands of CD80/86, CD28, CTLA-4 and PD-L1, differentially control immune synapse formation and function of the human Teff and Treg cells analyzed here. Individually targeting CD28, CTLA-4 and PD-L1 might therefore represent a valuable therapeutic strategy to treat immune disorders where effector and regulatory T cell functions need to be differentially targeted. Copyright: © 2013 Dilek et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Phenotypic and functional analyses of human regulatory T cells (Treg#1) and allogeneic human B-EBV cells phenotype. (A) Proliferation of CD4+CD252 T cells stimulated with irradiated allogeneic PBMC at day 5 in presence or not of autologous natural CD4+CD25HighCD127Low regulatory T cells (nTreg) or clone Treg#1 at a 1:1 ratio. **P,0.01. (B) The phenotype of Treg#1 clone is compared to effector T cell (Teff) by Flow Cytometry. Control: filled gray, Teff: black line and Treg#1: red line. (C) Costimulatory molecule expression analysis on CD20+ B-EBV lymphocytes (pool of 3 cell lines). Control: filled gray and B-EBV cells: green line. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083139.g001
  • Figure 2. Selective-CD28 blockade breaks Teff/APC immunological synapses (IS) and enhances Treg/APC immunological synapses.
  • Figure 3. Live-cell dynamic analysis of human Teff and Treg cells in presence of human B-EBV APCs. (A, C) Screenshots from movies representing Teff or Treg cells stained in green (non-activated cells) or red (activated cells) by Fura2-AM calcium probe in the presence of unstained B-EBV lymphocytes (APCs) in poly-L-lysine coated Labtech. Teff and Treg were pre-incubated with anti-CD28 (FR104) or anti-CD28+ anti-CTLA-4 or
  • Figure 4. Calcium flux profiles and quantification of calcium responses in Teff and Treg. The calcium flux of Teff (A) and Treg (C) cells, which established contacts with APCs, were analyzed by measuring the fluorescence of calcium probe (Fura2-AM) over a period of 20 minutes. All antibodies were used at 10 mg/ml. The profile of one representative cell for each condition is shown. Quantification of Teff cell (B) and Treg (D) activation was set by the number of calcium flux peaks/min. The number of calcium peaks analyzed in each condition was .30. *P,0.05 and ***p,0.001. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083139.g004
  • Figure 5. LFA-1 activation analyses by Flow Cytometry. (A) Profiles of CD11a, CD18 activation epitope (CD18act, representing ‘‘high affinity’’ conformation) and CD18 (CD18tot) expression by Teff and Treg#1 cells pre-incubated or not with indicated antibodies. Anti-CD28 and anti-CTLA-4 were used at 10 mg/ml. (B) Histograms of Mean Fluorescent Intensity (MFI) of CD11a, CD18act and CD18tot expressed on Teff and Treg#1 cells. Ratio CD18act MFI: CD18tot was established to analyze LFA-1 high affinity conformation in indicated conditions. Data are representative of more than three different experiments. Filled gray, negative control; Red line, Teff and Treg cells alone; Green line, cells with APC; Blue line, cells with APC and antiCD28; and Black line: cells with APC, anti-CD28 and anti-CTLA-4. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083139.g005
  • Figure 6. Enhanced suppressive activity of Treg with selective CD28-blockade. Treg cells were first primed against alloantigens, washed out and added to CD4+CD252 effector T cells stimulated with allogeneic irradiated mDC at the indicated ratio. Priming was performed with or without CD28 antagonists. Round symbols: no antagonist. Squares: addition of a CD28 antagonist. CD4+CD252 effector T cells proliferation (A, B) and IL-2 synthesis (C, D) after addition of clonal Treg (empty symbols; A, C) or natural Treg (filled symbols; B, D). Addition of Treg to APC in the absence of CD4+CD252 effector T cells resulted in less than 1000 CPM and undetectable IL-2 synthesis (data not shown). Results are mean cpm 6 SD or concentration in supernatants measured by CBA of one representative assay out of 3. *p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083139.g006
  • Figure 7. Proposed model for the role of CD28, CTLA-4 and PD-L1 in human Teff and Treg-APCs interactions. In control conditions, CD80/86 expressed by APCs interact with CD28, CTLA-4 and PD-L1 on Teff and Treg leading to long contacts and activation of Teff and to short contacts and absence of activation of Treg (A). In the presence of a selective CD28 antagonist, CD80/86 interact with CTLA-4 and PD-L1, leading to enhanced motility, reduced contacts and absence of activation in Teff, and to enhanced contacts and activation in Treg. Interestingly Treg motility is not affected, showing absence of modulation by CTLA-4 of the TCR-Stop signal in human Treg (B). If CD28 and CTLA-4 are simultaneously blocked, CD80 interacts with PD-L1. In these conditions Teff make long contacts with APCs but do not activate. Treg make short contacts and do not activate either, like in control conditions, and show enhanced velocity but not motility (C). If CD28, CTLA-4 and PD-L1 are simultaneously blocked, the only additional difference is that motility is increased in Treg, which shows that PD-L1 controls motility of human Treg (D). PD-1 and CD86 are also expressed by T cells and this adds a layer of complexity if T-T interactions had to be also addressed in addition to T-APCs interactions. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083139.g007

References Powered by Scopus

CTLA-4 control over Foxp3<sup>+</sup> regulatory T cell function

2442Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells

2044Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

IDO expression by dendritic cells: Tolerance and tryptophan catabolism

1998Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

CD28 Costimulation: From Mechanism to Therapy

627Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Treg-expressed CTLA-4 depletes CD80/CD86 by trogocytosis, releasing free PD-L1 on antigen-presenting cells

240Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Augmenting antitumor immune responses with epigenetic modifying agents

181Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dilek, N., Poirier, N., Hulin, P., Coulon, F., Mary, C., Ville, S., … Vanhove, B. (2013). Targeting CD28, CTLA-4 and PD-L1 costimulation differentially controls immune synapses and function of human regulatory and conventional t-cells. PLoS ONE, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083139

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 44

57%

Researcher 22

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29

34%

Medicine and Dentistry 25

29%

Immunology and Microbiology 21

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 10

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0