How are medical groups identified as high-performing? The effect of different approaches to classification of performance

8Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Payers and policy makers across the international healthcare market are increasingly using publicly available summary measures to designate providers as "high-performing", but no consistently-applied approach exists to identifying high performers. This paper uses publicly available data to examine how different classification approaches influence which providers are designated as "high-performers". METHODS: We conducted a quantitative analysis of cross-sectional publicly-available performance data in the U.S. We used 2014 Minnesota Community Measurement data from 58 medical groups to classify performance across 4 domains: quality (two process measures of cancer screening and 2 composite measures of chronic disease management), total cost of care, access (a composite CAHPS measure), and patient experience (3 CAHPS measures). We classified medical groups based on performance using either relative thresholds or absolute values of performance on all included measures. RESULTS: Using relative thresholds, none of the 58 medical groups achieved performance in the top 25% or 35% in all 4 performance domains. A relative threshold of 40% was needed before one group was classified as high-performing in all 4 domains. Using absolute threshold values, two medical groups were classified as high-performing across all 4 domains. In both approaches, designating "high performance" using fewer domains led to more groups designated as high-performers, though there was little to moderate concordance across identified "high-performing" groups. CONCLUSIONS: Classification of medical groups as high performing is sensitive to the domains of performance included, the classification approach, and choice of threshold. With increasing focus on achieving high performance in healthcare delivery, the absence of a consistently-applied approach to identify high performers impedes efforts to reliably compare, select and reward high-performing providers.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Scaling up sexually transmissible infections point-of-care testing in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities: healthcare workers’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of Variation in Electronic Health Record Capabilities and Reported Clinical Quality Performance in Ambulatory Care Clinics, 2014-2017

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automatic generation of minimum dataset and quality indicators from data collected routinely by the clinical information system in an intensive care unit

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahluwalia, S. C., Damberg, C. L., Haas, A., & Shekelle, P. G. (2019). How are medical groups identified as high-performing? The effect of different approaches to classification of performance. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 500. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4293-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

69%

Researcher 3

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 4

40%

Social Sciences 2

20%

Engineering 2

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free