Allostatic Load Measurement: A Systematic Review of Reviews, Database Inventory, and Considerations for Neighborhood Research

22Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Neighborhoods are critical to understanding how environments influence health outcomes. Prolonged environmental stressors, such as a lack of green spaces and neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, have been associated with higher allostatic load levels. Since allostatic load levels experienced earlier in life have stronger associations with mortality risk, neighborhoods may be uniquely suited to monitor and mitigate the impacts of environmental stressors. Researchers often study allostatic load in neighborhoods by utilizing administrative boundaries within publicly accessible databases as proxies for neighborhoods. Methods: This systematic review of reviews aims to identify commonly used biomarkers in the measurement of allostatic load, compare measurement approaches, inventory databases to study allostatic load, and spotlight considerations referenced in the literature where allostatic load is studied in neighborhoods. The review was conducted using the search term “allostatic load” in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases. The search results were filtered to include reviews. Results: The search returned 499 articles after deduplication. Overall, 18 synthesis reviews met the inclusion criteria and were retained for extraction. The synthesis reviews analyzed represented 238 studies published from 1995 to 2020. The original ten biomarkers were most often used to measure allostatic load. More recently, body mass index and C-reactive protein have additionally been frequently used to measure allostatic load burden. Conclusions: The scientific contributions of this study are that we have identified a clear gap in geographic considerations when studying allostatic load. The implication of this study is that we have highlighted geographic concepts when conducting neighborhood-level research using administrative databases as a neighborhood proxy and outlined emerging future trends that can enable future study of allostatic load in the neighborhood context.

References Powered by Scopus

AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

5902Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stress and the Individual: Mechanisms Leading to Disease

3078Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The social determinants of health: It's time to consider the causes of the causes

2357Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Architectural Allostatic Overloading: Exploring a Connection between Architectural Form and Allostatic Overloading

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The neurophysiological consequences of racism-related stressors in Black Americans

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Allostasis, health, and development in Latin America

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beese, S., Postma, J., & Graves, J. M. (2022, December 1). Allostatic Load Measurement: A Systematic Review of Reviews, Database Inventory, and Considerations for Neighborhood Research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417006

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

67%

Researcher 7

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

44%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

24%

Neuroscience 5

20%

Social Sciences 3

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free