Identifying candidate quality indicators of tools that support the practice of knowledge translation: a scoping review protocol

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to identify and characterize relevant knowledge translation methods tools (those that provide guidance for optimized knowledge translation practice) to uncover candidate quality indicators to inform a future quality assessment tool for knowledge translation strategies. Introduction: Knowledge translation strategies (defined as including knowledge translation interventions, tools, and products) target various knowledge users, including patients, clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers. The development and use of strategies that support knowledge translation practice have been rapidly increasing, making it difficult for knowledge users to decide which to use. There is limited evidence-based guidance or measures to help assess the overall quality of knowledge translation strategies. Inclusion criteria: Empirical and non-empirical documents will be considered if they explicitly describe a knowledge translation methods tool and its development, evaluation or validation, methodological strengths or limitations, and/or use over time. The review will consider a knowledge translation methods tool if it falls within at least one knowledge translation domain (ie, implementation, dissemination, sustainability, scalability, integrated knowledge translation) in the health field. Methods: We will conduct a systematic search of relevant electronic databases and gray literature. The search strategy will be developed iteratively by an experienced medical information specialist and peer-reviewed with the PRESS checklist. The search will be limited to English-only documents published from 2005 onward. Documents will be independently screened, selected, and extracted by 2 researchers. Data will be analyzed and summarized descriptively, including the characteristics of the included documents, knowledge translation methods tools, and candidate quality indicators.

References Powered by Scopus

PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation

20086Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States

4141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique

4023Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Making Sense of Theories, Models, and Frameworks in Digital Health Behavior Change Design: Qualitative Descriptive Study

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A scoping review reveals candidate quality indicators of knowledge translation and implementation science practice tools

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhuiya, A. R., Makarski, J., Hayden, L., Perrier, L., Munce, S., Lewis, I., … Kastner, M. (2023). Identifying candidate quality indicators of tools that support the practice of knowledge translation: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 21(1), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00055

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

75%

Linguistics 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free