Comment on 'A Social Network Based Process to Minimize In-Group Biasedness during Requirement Engineering'

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The author comment on the paper 'A Social Network Based Process to Minimize In-Group Biasedness During Requirement Engineering' by Mughal et al., and point out that the technique can be subsequently improved by focusing on three major areas: (a) differential treatment of crowd of users; (b) ranking of requirements (i.e., determining the importance of the requirements for different stakeholders) based on analysis of social interactions among stakeholders on Facebook; and (c) extension as well as improvement in result validations by improving effectiveness calculation and including scalability as one of the efficiency metrics. Scalability will influence both effectiveness as well as efficiency of the proposed technique.

References Powered by Scopus

An evaluation of methods for prioritizing software requirements

331Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Crowd in Requirements Engineering: The Landscape and Challenges

169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Two's company, three's a crowd: A case study of crowdsourcing software development

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Requirement Engineering Challenges for Social Sector Software Development: Insights from Multiple Case Studies

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Requirements engineering for social sector software applications: Innovating for a diverse set of user needs

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Online Feedback Management Tools for Early-Stage Startups: Hidden Treasures in the Rocky Mountains

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gupta, V. (2021). Comment on “A Social Network Based Process to Minimize In-Group Biasedness during Requirement Engineering.” IEEE Access. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073379

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 5

56%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

56%

Social Sciences 3

33%

Engineering 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free