Responsible reporting of health research studies: Transparent, complete, accurate and timely

34Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Complete, accurate and transparent reporting is an integral part of responsible research conduct. However, many studies have shown that health research publications frequently lack crucial information. Reporting guidelines like the CONSORT Statement help to improve the quality of research reports. Unfortunately, their uptake by journals and authors is still limited and does not maximize their potential. The EQUATOR Network, a new international initiative, leads the effort to promote transparent reporting of research and the use of reporting guidelines. It provides online resources and training relating to the reporting of health research, and assists in the development, dissemination and implementation of reporting guidelines (www.equator- network.org). Poor reporting practices can be decreased only through close collaboration of all parties involved in research and its publication; EQUATOR can facilitate the process. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53193Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies

3414Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials

3243Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Use of 3×2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: Meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies

147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality of reporting web-based and non-web-based survey studies: What authors, reviewers and consumers should consider

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biostatistics for Medical and Biomedical Practitioners

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Altman, D. G., & Simera, I. (2009). Responsible reporting of health research studies: Transparent, complete, accurate and timely. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 65(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkp410

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

55%

Researcher 5

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

31%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

31%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

19%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0