CASE AND COMMENTARY: PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE What Should Be Roles of Federal Clinician Governors in Motivating Equity in Locally Coordinated Triage Protocols?

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This commentary on a case examines racially inequitable outcomes, especially for Black patients, resulting from use of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores to triage patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and how inequitable outcomes in triage protocols could be reduced. It also considers the nature and scope of clinician governor responses to members of federally protected classes who are disadvantaged by use of the SOFA score and argues that clinician leaders of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, specifically, should provide federal guidance that motivates clear legal accountability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mikell, I. M., Savage Hoggard, C. L., & Schmidt, H. (2023). CASE AND COMMENTARY: PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE What Should Be Roles of Federal Clinician Governors in Motivating Equity in Locally Coordinated Triage Protocols? AMA Journal of Ethics, 25(3), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2023.179

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free