Does the National Health Insurance Scheme provide financial protection to households in Ghana?

45Citations
Citations of this article
261Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Excessive healthcare payments can impede access to health services and also disrupt the welfare of households with no financial protection. Health insurance is expected to offer financial protection against health shocks. Ghana began the implementation of its National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in 2004. The NHIS is aimed at removing the financial barrier to healthcare by limiting direct out-of-pocket health expenditures (OOPHE). The study examines the effect of the NHIS on OOPHE and how it protects households against catastrophic health expenditures. Methods: Data was obtained from a cross-sectional representative household survey involving 2,430 households from three districts across Ghana. All OOPHE associated with treatment seeking for reported illness in the household in the last 4 weeks preceding the survey were analysed and compared between insured and uninsured persons. The incidence and intensity of catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) among households were measured by the catastrophic health payment method. The relative effect of NHIS on the incidence of CHE in the household was estimated by multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: About 36% of households reported at least one illness during the 4 weeks period. Insured patients had significantly lower direct OOPHE for out-patient and in-patient care compared to the uninsured. On financial protection, the incidence of CHE was lower among insured households (2.9%) compared to the partially insured (3.7%) and the uninsured (4.0%) at the 40% threshold. The incidence of CHE was however significantly lower among fully insured households (6.0%) which sought healthcare from NHIS accredited health facilities compared to the partially insured (10.1%) and the uninsured households (23.2%). The likelihood of a household incurring CHE was 4.2 times less likely for fully insured and 2.9 times less likely for partially insured households relative to being uninsured. The NHIS has however not completely eliminated OOPHE for the insured and their households. Conclusion: The NHIS has significant effect in reducing OOPHE and offers financial protection against CHE for insured individuals and their households though they still made some out-of-pocket payments. Efforts should aim at eliminating OOPHE for the insured if the objective for establishing the NHIS is to be achieved.

References Powered by Scopus

Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data - Or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India

4186Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What are the economic consequences for households of illness and of paying for health care in low- and middle-income country contexts?

561Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Extending health insurance to the rural population: An impact evaluation of China's new cooperative medical scheme

535Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessing the impoverishing effects, and factors associated with the incidence of catastrophic health care payments in Kenya

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating the impact of the national health insurance scheme of Ghana on out of pocket expenditures: A systematic review

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The catastrophic and impoverishing effects of out-of-pocket healthcare payments in Kenya, 2018

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kusi, A., Hansen, K. S., Asante, F. A., & Enemark, U. (2015). Does the National Health Insurance Scheme provide financial protection to households in Ghana? BMC Health Services Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0996-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 108

74%

Researcher 23

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 13

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 44

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 32

26%

Social Sciences 23

19%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free