Performance of a non-load-bearing steel stud gypsum board wall assembly: Experiments and modelling

22Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A gypsum wall assembly was exposed to an intense real-scale compartment fire. For the wall assembly, temperatures were measured at the exposed face, within the stud cavity, and at the unexposed face during the fire exposure. Total heat flux gauges were used to measure the temporal variation of the energy incident on the walls, and cameras, both visual and infrared, were used to image the unexposed face of the wall assembly during the fire exposure. The behaviour of the wall assembly under the fire load is discussed as are current model results for a simulation of the fire test. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

A model for predicting heat transfer through gypsum‐board/wood‐stud walls exposed to fire

162Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thermal properties of gypsum plasterboard at high temperatures

141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A model for predicting heat transfer through noninsulated unloaded steel-stud gypsum board wall assemblies exposed to fire

103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Gypsum board reaction kinetics at elevated temperatures

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Numerical investigation of simultaneous heat and mass transfer mechanisms occurring in a gypsum board exposed to fire conditions

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heat transfer mechanisms and models for a gypsum board exposed to fire

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manzello, S. L., Gann, R. G., Kukuck, S. R., Prasad, K., & Jones, W. W. (2007). Performance of a non-load-bearing steel stud gypsum board wall assembly: Experiments and modelling. Fire and Materials, 31(5), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.939

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2202468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

75%

Researcher 4

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 17

94%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0