Forest management intensity: A comparison of timber investment management organizations and industrial landowners in Mississippi

15Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

All timberland investment management organizations (TIMOs) and industrial landowners in Mississippi were surveyed during 1998 and 1999 to determine their annual forest management practices and related expenditures. The response rate was 65%, and respondents accounted for approximately 90% of the timberland owned by these two landowner groups. For analysis purposes, industrial landowners were separated into two categories: large (>10,000 ac) and small (<10,000 ac). Pine plantations represented 66% of TIMOs' timberland base compared to 55% for large industrial landowners and less than 50% for small industrial landowners. Over the 2 yr study period, TIMOs and large industrial landowners invested heavily in site preparation and planting as well as midrotation chemical release and fertilization. In contrast, small industrial landowners relied on natural regeneration to a much greater extent and conducted few, if any, midrotation treatments. As a group, TIMOs and industrial landowners spent approximately $20/ac annually on their Mississippi timberlands. Overhead represented slightly over 40% of this total, with silvicultural treatments accounting for the remainder. Property taxes represented the largest overhead expense. In total, these landowners spent $67 million in 1998 and $54 million in 1999 to maintain and manage their Mississippi timberlands.

References Powered by Scopus

Institutional ownership of US timberland: History, rationale, and implications for forest management

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Private Investment in Forest Management and the Long-Term Supply of Timber

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Forest management expenses of Mississippi's nonindustrial private forest landowners

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management

211Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating forest management intensity: A comparison among major forest landowner types

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Extending timber rotations: Carbon and cost implications

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rogers, W. R., & Munn, I. A. (2003). Forest management intensity: A comparison of timber investment management organizations and industrial landowners in Mississippi. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 27(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/27.2.83

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Researcher 4

36%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

45%

Environmental Science 4

36%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

9%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free