Criteria for evaluating molecular markers: Comprehensive quality metrics to improve marker-assisted selection

59Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite strong interest over many years, the usage of quantitative trait loci in plant breeding has often failed to live up to expectations. A key weak point in the utilisation of QTLs is the “quality” of markers used during marker-assisted selection (MAS): unreliable markers result in variable outcomes, leading to a perception that MAS products fail to achieve reliable improvement. Most reports of markers used for MAS focus on markers derived from the mapping population. There are very few studies that examine the reliability of these markers in other genetic backgrounds, and critically, no metrics exist to describe and quantify this reliability. To improve the MAS process, this work proposes five core metrics that fully describe the reliability of a marker. These metrics give a comprehensive and quantitative measure of the ability of a marker to correctly classify germplasm as QTL[+]/[–], particularly against a background of high allelic diversity. Markers that score well on these metrics will have far higher reliability in breeding, and deficiencies in specific metrics give information on circumstances under which a marker may not be reliable. The metrics are applicable across different marker types and platforms, allowing an objective comparison of the performance of different markers irrespective of the platform. Evaluating markers using these metrics demonstrates that trait-specific markers consistently out-perform markers designed for other purposes. These metrics also provide a superb set of criteria for designing superior marker systems for a target QTL, enabling the selection of an optimal marker set before committing to design.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Platten, J. D., Cobb, J. N., & Zantua, R. E. (2019). Criteria for evaluating molecular markers: Comprehensive quality metrics to improve marker-assisted selection. PLoS ONE, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210529

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

57%

Researcher 21

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46

73%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 14

22%

Environmental Science 2

3%

Chemistry 1

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 29

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free