Extremely low frequency magnetic field exposure and parkinson’s disease—a systematic review and meta-analysis of the data

16Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between occupational exposure to extremely-low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and Parkinson’s disease. Methods: We systematically searched publications reporting risk estimates of Parkinson’s disease in workers exposed to ELF-MF. Summary relative risks were obtained with random effects meta-analysis. Results: We included 11 studies. To assign exposure, four studies evaluated occupational records, four used census, interview or questionnaire information and three used death certificates. Risk of Parkinson’s disease was not elevated in workers exposed to ELF-MF with a summary relative risk of 1.05, 95% CI 0.98-1.13. Conclusions: Overall, there was no evidence that the exposure to ELF-MF increases the risk of Parkinson’s disease.

References Powered by Scopus

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

42701Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

32790Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

26913Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Environmental risk factors and Parkinson's disease: An umbrella review of meta-analyses

325Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses

152Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biological effects of exposure to static electric fields in humans and vertebrates: A systematic review

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huss, A., Koeman, T., Kromhout, H., & Vermeulen, R. (2015). Extremely low frequency magnetic field exposure and parkinson’s disease—a systematic review and meta-analysis of the data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(7), 7348–7356. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707348

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

56%

Researcher 6

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

47%

Environmental Science 4

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

16%

Neuroscience 3

16%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0