Prehospital supplemental oxygen in trauma patients: Its efficacy and implications for military medical care

25Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite its near-universal use, few data exist to support the efficacy of prehospital supplemental oxygen (PH O2) in trauma patients. Data were reviewed from 5,090 patients not requiring assisted ventilation who were transported to our level I trauma center. Of these, 2,203 (43.3%) received PH O2 and 2,887 (56.7%) did not. Patients who received PH O2 had higher mortality than those without PH O2 (2.3% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.011). When corrected for Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, and age, those receiving PH O2 fared worse or no better than those who did not receive it. This suggests that supplemental oxygen does not improve survival in traumatized patients who are not in respiratory distress. This has implications for the management of casualties in combat or austere environments. Copyright © by Association of Military Surgeons of U.S., 2004.

References Powered by Scopus

Advanced or basic life support for trauma: Meta-analysis and critical review of the literature

213Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Viet nam wound analysis

183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation for Trauma Does Not Improve Survival over Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation

137Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Automated closed loop control of inspired oxygen concentration

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence of prehospital hypoxemia and oxygen use in trauma patients

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pre-hospital oxygen therapy

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stockinger, Z. T., & McSwain, N. E. (2004). Prehospital supplemental oxygen in trauma patients: Its efficacy and implications for military medical care. Military Medicine, 169(8), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.169.8.609

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

12%

Researcher 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

56%

Chemistry 3

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

17%

Social Sciences 2

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free