Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases

100Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) unenhanced steady state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the evaluation of thoracic aortic diseases. Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with known or suspected thoracic aortic disease underwent free-breathing ECG-gated unenhanced SSFP MRA with non-selective radiofrequency excitation and contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA of the thorax at 1.5T. Two readers independently evaluated the two datasets for image quality in the aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending aorta, and origins of supra-aortic arteries, and for abnormal findings. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were determined for both datasets. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MRA for the diagnosis of aortic abnormalities were determined. Results: Abnormal aortic findings, including aneurysm (n=47), coarctation (n=14), dissection (n=12), aortic graft (n=6), intramural hematoma (n=11), mural thrombus in the aortic arch (n=1), and penetrating aortic ulcer (n=9), were confidently detected on both datasets. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of SSFP MRA for the detection of aortic disease were 100% with CE-MRA serving as a reference standard. Image quality of the aortic root was significantly higher on SSFP MRA (P<0.001) with no significant difference for other aortic segments (P>0.05). SNR and CNR values were higher for all segments on SSFP MRA (P<0.01). Conclusion: Our results suggest that free-breathing navigator-gated 3D SSFP MRA with non-selective radiofrequency excitation is a promising technique that provides high image quality and diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of thoracic aortic disease without the need for intravenous contrast material. © 2009 The Author(s).

References Powered by Scopus

SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI

5681Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions (GRAPPA)

4333Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: Risk factors and incidence estimation

839Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

817Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

286Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Magnetic resonance angiography: Current status and future directions

153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krishnam, M. S., Tomasian, A., Malik, S., Desphande, V., Laub, G., & Ruehm, S. G. (2010). Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases. European Radiology, 20(6), 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1672-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 19

43%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

39%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 28

67%

Engineering 9

21%

Physics and Astronomy 3

7%

Computer Science 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free