Effects of Variety and Pulsed Electric Field on the Quality of Fresh-Cut Apples

14Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The suitability of five apple varieties (Ralls, Qinguan, Fuji, Delicious, and Cattle) for fresh-cut processing was compared based on the evaluation of weight loss, firmness, color, titratable acid (TA), polyphenoloxidase (PPO) activity and peroxidase (POD) activity, and the impact of pulsed electronic field (PEF) on fresh-cut apples’ quality was explored. The results showed that the changes to Delicious apples in terms of the color parameter, firmness, and weight loss were comparable to or lower than the other samples, while the TA content was higher than the other samples during storage. Therefore, Delicious was selected for the study of the effects of PEF on fresh-cut apples. By measuring the physicochemical properties and microbiological characteristics within 10 days of storage, it was found that the PPO and POD activity of apples treated with PEF at 3 kV/cm on the 10th day decreased the most, with 44.61% and 36.48% decreases, respectively. In addition, apples treated with 5 kV/cm showed the greatest decrease in malondialdehyde (MDA) content and the number of microorganisms, 63.98%, and 9.17%, respectively. In general, the PEF-treated apples retained a high level of quality. These results suggested that PEF treatment is a promising technology for extending the storage period of fresh-cut apples.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text

Effect of nano-ZnO-coated active packaging on quality of fresh-cut 'Fuji' apple

140Citations
156Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Z., Yang, H., Fang, W., Huang, X., Shi, J., & Zou, X. (2023). Effects of Variety and Pulsed Electric Field on the Quality of Fresh-Cut Apples. Agriculture (Switzerland), 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050929

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Researcher 2

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

80%

Engineering 2

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0