Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City

89Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study provides the first comprehensive analysis of individual perceptions of tail risks. It focuses not only on the probability, as has been studied by Nicholas Barberis and others, but also on anticipation of damage. We examine how those perceptions relate to experts’ estimates and publicly available risk information. Behavioural factors—availability bias, threshold models of choice, worry and trust—are found to have a significant impact on risk perceptions. The probability of tail events is overestimated, which is consistent with probability weighting in prospect theory. Potential damage is underestimated, one reason why individuals do not invest in protective measures.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Botzen, W. J. W., Kunreuther, H., & Michel-Kerjan, E. (2015). Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(4), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500005179

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 47

61%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

13%

Researcher 10

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32

50%

Social Sciences 13

20%

Environmental Science 10

16%

Engineering 9

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0