Australian families living with rare disease: Experiences of diagnosis, health services use and needs for psychosocial support

202Citations
Citations of this article
275Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Families of children living with a rare disease report significant health and social burden, however, few studies have systematically examined family needs by using validated tools to assess the scope and extent of this burden. Our aim was to develop a comprehensive survey to assess health, psychosocial and financial impacts on Australian families caring for a child with a rare disease. Methods. We developed a self-administered survey for parents/carers incorporating pre-validated tools. The survey included questions about experiences of diagnosis, health services use and needs, needs for peer and financial supports. Forty-seven families attending the state-wide Genetic Metabolic Disorders Service at the Childrens Hospital at Westmead, Sydney were invited to participate. Results: Of 46 families who received the survey, 30 (65%) completed it. Most (93%) found the survey acceptable and relevant (91%). Patients were 1-17 years old, 14 (47%) male, and 12 (40%) non-Caucasian. Eighteen (60%) had a lysosomal storage disease and 12(40%) had a mitochondrial disorder. Eleven (38%) saw 3-5 doctors and four (14%) saw 6-10 doctors before receiving the correct diagnosis; 43% felt diagnosis was delayed. Four (13%) were dissatisfied with the way diagnosis was given, due to insensitive style of communication, inadequate information and psychological support. Psychosocial impact was moderate to high for 90% of families and the level of impact was not dependent on the level of health functioning of the child. Twenty-six (87%) wanted, but only 13(43%) received, information about peer-support groups. The 30 children accounted for 168 visits to general practitioners and 260 visits to specialist doctors; 21 (70%) children had at least one admission to hospital, including one who had 16 admissions in the previous 12 months. Most families (77%) received financial assistance but 52% believed this was insufficient. Families benefited from a specialised multi-disciplinary clinic but called for patient-held electronic medical records. Conclusions: Australian families caring for children with genetic metabolic disorders are adversely impacted by delays in diagnosis, lack of easy access to peer support groups and lack of psychological support. Further research is needed to estimate economic impact and to analyse health service delivery models for children with rare diseases in Australia. © 2013 Anderson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): Concepts, measurement properties and applications

1153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations

602Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact on family scale revisited: Further psychometric data

219Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cystathionine beta-synthase deficiency

260Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The supportive care needs of parents caring for a child with a rare disease: A scoping review

193Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Australian children living with rare diseases: experiences of diagnosis and perceived consequences of diagnostic delays

143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, M., Elliott, E. J., & Zurynski, Y. A. (2013). Australian families living with rare disease: Experiences of diagnosis, health services use and needs for psychosocial support. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-22

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 108

72%

Researcher 25

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 45

37%

Psychology 34

28%

Nursing and Health Professions 22

18%

Social Sciences 21

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free