Relative importance of environmental, geographic, and spatial variables on zooplankton metacommunities

22Citations
Citations of this article
110Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Understanding the factors responsible for structuring ecological communities is a central goal in community ecology. Previous work has focused on determining the relative roles of two classes of variables (e.g., spatial and environmental) on community composition. However, this approach may ignore the disproportionate impact of variables within classes, and is often confounded by spatial autocorrelation leading to collinearity among variables of different classes. Here, we combine pattern-based metacommunity and machine learning analyses to characterize metacommunity structure of zooplankton from lakes in the northeast United States and to identify environmental, spatial, and geographic covariates associated with metacommunity structure. Analyses were performed for the entire metacommunity and for three zooplankton subsets (cladocerans, copepods, and rotifers), as the variables associated with community structure in these groups were hypothesized to differ. Species distributions of all subsets adhered to an environmental, spatial, and/or geographic gradient, but differed in metacommunity pattern, as copepod species distributions responded independently of one another, while the entire zooplankton metacommunity, cladocerans, and rotifers replaced one another in discrete groups. While environmental variables were nearly always the most important to metacommunity structure, the relative importance of variables differed among zooplankton subsets, suggesting that zooplankton subsets differ in their environmental tolerances and dispersal-limitation.

References Powered by Scopus

APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language

9358Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A working guide to boosted regression trees

5040Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology

4031Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Metacommunity ecology meets biogeography: effects of geographical region, spatial dynamics and environmental filtering on community structure in aquatic organisms

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Do metacommunity theories explain spatial variation in fish assemblage structure in a pristine tropical river?

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Elements of metacommunity structure of river and riparian assemblages: Communities, taxonomic groups and deconstructed trait groups

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dallas, T., & Drake, J. M. (2014). Relative importance of environmental, geographic, and spatial variables on zooplankton metacommunities. Ecosphere, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00071.1

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 54

64%

Researcher 24

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41

48%

Environmental Science 39

46%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 4

5%

Materials Science 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0