Sources of variability in interceptive movements

39Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In order to successfully intercept a moving target one must be at the right place at the right time. But simply being there is seldom enough. One usually needs to make contact in a certain manner, for instance to hit the target in a certain direction. How this is best achieved depends on the exact task, but to get an idea of what factors may limit performance we asked people to hit a moving virtual disk through a virtual goal, and analysed the spatial and temporal variability in the way in which they did so. We estimated that for our task the standard deviations in timing and spatial accuracy are about 20 ms and 5 mm. Additional variability arises from individual movements being planned slightly differently and being adjusted during execution. We argue that the way that our subjects moved was precisely tailored to the task demands, and that the movement accuracy is not only limited by the muscles and their activation, but also-and probably even mainly-by the resolution of visual perception.

References Powered by Scopus

Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning

1925Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Information capacity of discrete motor responses

1056Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living

890Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Keep your eyes on the ball: Smooth pursuit eye movements enhance prediction of visual motion

98Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Interaction Between Vision and Eye Movements<sup>†</sup>

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Continuous visual control of interception

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2009). Sources of variability in interceptive movements. Experimental Brain Research, 195(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1757-x

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

46%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

23%

Researcher 11

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 20

44%

Sports and Recreations 11

24%

Neuroscience 9

20%

Engineering 5

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0