2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

1.5kCitations
Citations of this article
1.9kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To develop new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) jointly supported by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Methods: This international initiative had four phases. 1) Evaluation of antinuclear antibody (ANA) as an entry criterion through systematic review and meta-regression of the literature and criteria generation through an international Delphi exercise, an early patient cohort, and a patient survey. 2) Criteria reduction by Delphi and nominal group technique exercises. 3) Criteria definition and weighting based on criterion performance and on results of a multi-criteria decision analysis. 4) Refinement of weights and threshold scores in a new derivation cohort of 1,001 subjects and validation compared with previous criteria in a new validation cohort of 1,270 subjects. Results: The 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE include positive ANA at least once as obligatory entry criterion; followed by additive weighted criteria grouped in 7 clinical (constitutional, hematologic, neuropsychiatric, mucocutaneous, serosal, musculoskeletal, renal) and 3 immunologic (antiphospholipid antibodies, complement proteins, SLE-specific antibodies) domains, and weighted from 2 to 10. Patients accumulating ≥10 points are classified. In the validation cohort, the new criteria had a sensitivity of 96.1% and specificity of 93.4%, compared with 82.8% sensitivity and 93.4% specificity of the ACR 1997 and 96.7% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 criteria. Conclusion: These new classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary and international input, and have excellent sensitivity and specificity. Use of ANA entry criterion, hierarchically clustered, and weighted criteria reflects current thinking about SLE and provides an improved foundation for SLE research.

References Powered by Scopus

The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus

12966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

10104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Derivation and validation of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus

4057Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Update in the diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus

453Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection and interpretation

296Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comprehensive systematic analysis and modelling study

227Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aringer, M., Costenbader, K., Daikh, D., Brinks, R., Mosca, M., Ramsey-Goldman, R., … Johnson, S. R. (2019). 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis and Rheumatology, 71(9), 1400–1412. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40930

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 437

68%

Researcher 115

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 59

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 35

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 672

81%

Immunology and Microbiology 59

7%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 55

7%

Nursing and Health Professions 43

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 6
References: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 74

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free