Endogeneity and marketing strategy research: an overview

159Citations
Citations of this article
325Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Endogeneity in empirical marketing research is an increasingly discussed topic in academic research. Mentions of endogeneity and related procedures to correct for it have risen 5x across the field’s top journals in the past 20 years, but represent an overall small portion of extant research. Yet there is often substantial difficulty in reconciling issues of endogeneity with many of the substantive questions of interest to marketing strategy for both theoretical and/or practical reasons. This paper provides an overview of main causes of endogeneity, approaches to addressing it, and guidance to marketing strategy researchers to balance these issues as the field continues to move towards more methodological sophistication, potentially at the expense of managerial tractability.

References Powered by Scopus

The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

21061Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies

8395Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables

3725Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Artificial Intelligence and Marketing: Pitfalls and Opportunities

245Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive, affective, and behavioral consumer responses to augmented reality in e-commerce: A comparative study

197Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Revisiting Gaussian copulas to handle endogenous regressors

133Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rutz, O. J., & Watson, G. F. (2019, May 15). Endogeneity and marketing strategy research: an overview. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00630-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 129

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 22

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 21

11%

Researcher 12

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 135

78%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 20

11%

Social Sciences 12

7%

Engineering 7

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free