Efficient moving horizon estimation and nonlinear model predictive control

76Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

State estimation from plant measurements should play an essential role in any advanced process control technology. Unlike the model predictive control (MPC) regulator, however, this area has received little attention. In this paper, we address the computational issues surrounding constrained moving horizon estimation (MHE) by presenting an algorithm for the efficient computation of moving horizon estimates. In our discussion, we present structured solvers for use with MHE, derive formulas for a nonlinear covariance smoothing update, and describe interactions between MHE and nonlinear target calculations. We conclude with relevant examples of MHE operating in a closed loop to remove non-zero mean disturbances, poor initial estimates, and random noise.

References Powered by Scopus

Constrained linear state estimation - A moving horizon approach

520Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Application of interior-point methods to model predictive control

428Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Active set vs. interior point strategies for model predictive control

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Efficient numerical methods for nonlinear MPC and moving horizon estimation

468Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Critical evaluation of extended Kalman filtering and moving-horizon estimation

398Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Particle filtering and moving horizon estimation

283Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tenny, M. J., & Rawlings, J. B. (2002). Efficient moving horizon estimation and nonlinear model predictive control. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference (Vol. 6, pp. 4475–4480). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2002.1025355

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 46

81%

Researcher 8

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 46

79%

Chemical Engineering 8

14%

Computer Science 2

3%

Mathematics 2

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free