Using bibliometrics in evaluating research

  • Pendlebury D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Counting, measuring, comparing quantities, analyzing measurements: quantitative analysis, as Lord Kelvin’s famous observation suggests, is perhaps the main tool of science. In this century, the volume of scientific research—measuring to “know something”—and recording and communicating that knowledge through publications, has itself become enormous and complex. Science research is now such a large enterprise and the substance of scientific research is so complex and specialized that personal knowledge and experience are no longer sufficient tools for understanding trends or for making decisions.

Author supplied keywords

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pendlebury, D. a. (2008). Using bibliometrics in evaluating research. In Thomson Reuters (p. 8). Thomson Reuters.

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

46%

Researcher 13

37%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 16

41%

Computer Science 9

23%

Business, Management and Accounting 8

21%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free